Taking the ovewiver, this post is first class

Tzu Chi buddhist foundation, self-described a religious charity organization, is part of the „new religion” movement, being defined by Mahayana buddhist type’s altruistic-pacifist ideology. Yet, it has some elemets that can bring it closer to fundamentalism. Even if it relativity applies on Peter Herriot’s definitional structure, fact that demonstrate it’s non-appartainence to real-fundamentalist categories, it can still be considerated as a first-level soft fundamentalism. (soft-fundamentalism is reffering to those groups that practice ad-literam reading of the holy books and selectivity interprets them, being defined by the existence of a (non-) accentuated milennial view while having a non-intention of a military confrontation against the enemy, considered of „the others”-a non-participant to the group’s activities/principles)

I think I need to try it.

One can feel the chi in the first tai chi session when you meet an enieghtlned master. One can also see the chi as an aura if you are fated to meet your real tai chi guru/master. The great one can instantly activate your Ren and Du mai and eventually open up your spiritual awareness when he links you to the Divine music.

Kas ta dogma? Čia kažkokia užkrečiama liga? Brrrr Aš toks išsiblaskęs... Žmonės brangieji kaip nuo jos pasveikti?

Teks į Prancūziją vykti etastuotis. :) Visas dogmas reikia nusivalyti...

Pasaulyje augę žmonės kaip visada daug protingesni už dogmatiškus lietuvių "filosofus".

Nereika tu galimybiu. Sikpuodis yra sikpuodis. Koks dar kurinys?

Kas su tavimi darosi, mergyt?

Geras straipnis tikrai...

šiaip menininko puslapis labai informatyvus. Man vaizdai jo įdomesni nei šnekta

Kodėl kūrinys praradęs ideologinį dėmenį turi sunykti. Reikėtų galimybių jiems, kaip Andy Warhol šikpuodžiams gyventi naują gyvenimą. Geras straipsnis+